Search This Blog

Thursday, March 3, 2016

Cracking the Whip

This is the message given in the Wednesday night Lent service in the Gettysburg United Methodist church on March 2, 2016.  The Bible verses are John 2:13-24.


            In these Wednesday services, we’ve been looking at the deliberate choices Jesus made that led to him being arrested, convicted, and killed on a cross.  Tonight we look at one of the biggest ones.  Jesus went to the temple courts, took a whip, chased the moneychangers out of there, turned over the tables, and told the people there that they had turned a holy place into a marketplace.
            Now, some of you know this, but for those who don’t, here’s a little context.  When people came to the temple in Jerusalem, they were required to either pay some money or sacrifice an animal.  But the money they used could only be the local currency that they used in Jerusalem, and the animal could only be one that they bought at the temple with that local currency.  And of course, people came from all over to worship at the temple, because the temple was the central holy place of the Jewish people.  So, when people came from all over, they brought the money that was used where they came from, and they had to exchange it for the local Jerusalem currency to pay at the temple. 
That’s where the money changers came in.  They’d exchange other types of money for the local Jerusalem currency.  And to do this, they set up shop right in the temple courts, right next to where the money was supposed to be paid.  But, of course, they did not do this for free.  There was a charge involved, and they could charge pretty much whatever they wanted, because after all, what could you do?  You had to have Jerusalem money, and this was the only place you could get it from.  And you had to have a local animal to sacrifice, and this was the only place you could get that, too.  So, the money changers and the sellers of animals made out pretty well.
The temple courts were supposed to be a holy place.  And here these people were, making money off it.  And not only that, they were making more money than any reasonable person would think was fair.  And they were doing it with the blessing of the Jewish authorities.  In fact, sometimes those authorities were money changers themselves.  Jesus was outraged.  And he reacted.
As we look at it now, we can understand Jesus’ outrage.  But at the time, no one else seemed to be particularly outraged.  Maybe some people grumbled privately, but it looks like most people, even if they were not very happy about it, accepted it.  This was just the way things were.  You did what you had to do and life went on.
This passage is often used as an example that Jesus could get angry.  And he was angry, I have no doubt about that.  But I don’t think Jesus just blew his top and reacted without thinking.  I think that, even though Jesus was angry, he still knew what he was doing.  I think these actions of Jesus were a deliberate choice that he made.
So, as we’ve done with the other choices Jesus made, we need to look at a two questions.  Why did Jesus do this?  And what can we learn from it?
Jesus had other options, after all.  He could have just accepted the situation.  After all, that’s what everyone else seemed to do.  He could’ve just grumbled about it.  That’s what some people probably did, too.  He could’ve gone to the temple authorities privately and tried to convince them to change things.  He could’ve just spoken out against the situation and encouraged other people to try to change it.  He could’ve gone directly to the money changers and told them they were sinners and needed to change their ways.  There were all kinds of other things Jesus could’ve done short of turning over tables and chasing people with a whip.  And all of those other options would’ve gotten Jesus into much less trouble with the authorities than turning over tables and chasing people with a whip.  But still that’s what Jesus chose to do.
Why did Jesus do this?  It seems kind of extreme, right?  We’re always told that, when there’s a conflict, we need to communicate.  We need to talk to each other.  We need to look for common ground.  We need to try to compromise.  And besides, Jesus was the Prince of Peace.  This was not exactly a peaceful action, was it?  This was violent.  And we’re always told that violence never solves anything.  Besides, this was going to get Jesus into all kinds of trouble.
In thinking about why Jesus did this, let’s start with the words of Jesus that are given us.  He says, “Get out of here!  Stop turning my Father’s house into a market!”  In Matthew’s gospel, Jesus is quoted as saying, “It is written, ‘My house will be called a house of prayer,’ but you are making it ‘a den of robbers.’”  Mark’s version is similar, except he says Jesus said, ““Is it not written: ‘My house will be called a house of prayer for all nations”.   And we’re also told in John that the disciples remembered the words of Psalm 69, “Zeal for your house will consume me.”
I think, then, that Jesus did this because the temple courts were supposed to be a holy place.  It was supposed to be a place where everyone would be equal before God, and where everyone would come to worship God, to confess their sins to God, and to receive God’s forgiveness and God’s blessings.  And instead, it was now a place where not only was everyone not equal, but where people were being taken advantage of, even robbed.  And it was being done in the name of God.
Jesus decided that situation was not one that could be tolerated.  It could not be compromised.  It was wrong.  It was bad.  It was evil.  And Jesus did not see any point in talking with evil.  He did not see any common ground that could be found with evil.  He could not see any advantage in compromising with evil.  The only thing that could be done with evil was to defeat it and drive it out of the temple.  And so Jesus decided he had to do that, no matter what the consequences were to him.
And I think that’s the lesson for us.  When we see a situation that is evil, it cannot be compromised, and it cannot be tolerated.  Evil must be defeated and driven out.  Period.
But notice that we have to apply this lesson very carefully.  This is the only time that it’s recorded that Jesus ever did something like this.  There were times he spoke out against things, there were times he spoke out against people, but he did not attack them.  So we need to know what it was about this specific situation that made Jesus decide it was so evil that this kind of extreme measure had to be taken.  And just as important, we need to know what it was about other situations that made Jesus decide those were not evil, at least not in this way.
For one thing, it was not the fact that sin was involved.  Jesus ran into sin all the time.  Some of his best friends were the people society declared to be “sinners”.  So the fact that the money changers were sinners was not the problem.
It was not something that violated the societal standards of the day.  It was not even something that violated the religious standards of the day.  Society approved of this.  The religious leaders approved of it.  That was not the problem, either.
We also need to note that this was not something that was done personally against Jesus.  Jesus was not physically or emotionally harmed by this.  In fact, when people did harm Jesus physically, and even when they turned on him and betrayed him, he not only allowed it all to happen, he forgave the people who did it.  So it was not a personal thing that made Jesus so upset.
And it was not simply that people were making money that had Jesus so upset.  There were lots of people who made money in Jesus’ time, just as there are now.  There were plenty of rich people around in Jesus’ time, just as there are now.  And sometimes they took advantage of people.  Jesus did not condemn them, at least not in this way.  I’m not saying Jesus approved of taking advantage of people—he certainly did not—but he did not take after those people with a whip, either.  So there had to be more to it than that.
I think what it was is that Jesus thought that this was a deliberate insult to God.  It was not just that it was wrong.  It was not just that it was breaking God’s laws.  It was not just that it was sinful.  What made this evil in Jesus’ eyes, so evil that it could not be tolerated in any way, so evil that it had to be defeated and driven out, was that it was a wrong that was being done by the religious leaders, by people who knew exactly what they were doing, for their own personal gain, and it was being done in a place that had been set apart as holy.
In other words, the religious leaders deliberately took something that was supposed to be used for the worship of God, and used it for their own personal benefit.  They claimed to be God’s greatest champions, and yet they really did not care about God at all.  They were just using God to make money.  That’s what made what they were doing evil.  And that’s why Jesus could not and would not tolerate it or compromise with it, regardless of what the consequences to him might be.
Jesus calls us to accept a lot of things that we might otherwise consider intolerable.  Wrongful actions, personal insults, all kinds of things.  But when we see deliberate insults to God by people who know exactly what they are doing, for no reason other than their own personal gain, we should not accept that, and we should not tolerate it.  I’m not suggesting we should all go out and buy whips.  But I am suggesting that there are situations that cannot be compromised and that cannot be tolerated.  They don’t happen often, but they happen.  And when they do, we need to be prepared to stand up for our faith.  Regardless of what the consequences may be. 

No comments:

Post a Comment